I do think that, since quite early on, we've had macro-scale questions here as well as micro ones. The oldest surviving macro questions I've found are from the first few weeks of the site: Which gases increase the greenhouse effect more than carbon dioxide? (which is also relevant at the micro scale) and Are economies that need growth unsustainable? .

My own interests are very much at the macro scale.

So, yes, I'd very much support a change of name, and a change in our tagline to reflect that we cover the macro and the micro.

I do think that, since quite early on, we've had macro-scale questions here as well as micro ones. The oldest surviving macro questions I've found are from the first few weeks of the site: Which gases increase the greenhouse effect more than carbon dioxide? (which is also relevant at the micro scale) and Are economies that need growth unsustainable? .

My own interests are very much at the macro scale.

So, yes, I'd very much support a change of name, and a change in our tagline to reflect that we cover the macro and the micro.

I do think that, since quite early on, we've had macro-scale questions here as well as micro ones. The oldest surviving macro questions I've found are from the first few weeks of the site: Which gases increase the greenhouse effect more than carbon dioxide? (which is also relevant at the micro scale) and Are economies that need growth unsustainable? .

My own interests are very much at the macro scale.

I do think that, since quite early on, we've had macro-scale questions here as well as micro ones. The oldest surviving macro questions I've found are from the first few weeks of the site: Which gases increase the greenhouse effect more than carbon dioxide? (which is also relevant at the micro scale) and Are economies that need growth unsustainable? .

My own interests are very much at the macro scale.

So, yes, I'd very much support a change of name, and a change in our tagline to reflect that we cover the macro and the micro.