I originally joined this group thinking that is was primarily about what I would call local practices. I find that most of it is involved in world practice. Now this is not a bad thing. I may have stumbled into the wrong group.

Examples of world practice:

  • Sulfur dioxide injection into the stratusphere.
  • Carbon tax
  • Iron fertilization of the oceans.
  • Mineral extraction from seawater.
  • Charcoal sequesterization by Terra Preta

Examples of local practice:

  • Artificial ponds on intermittent streams to create year round wildlife water access.
  • Microclimate modification using landscaping
  • Optimum extraction rates for locally abundant, but non-renewable resources.
  • Introduction of suitably selected species to increase biodiversity/help plants keep up with shifting vegetation zones.
  • Marketing ideas to help local eating/working groups.

1 Answer 1


There's enough space for both world-scale and local-scale, and a large enough cross-over audience interested in both, as well as specialists in areas of each. As you've identified in your question, we've had good world-scale questions with good answers; and good local-scale questions with good answers.

I've seen no evidence that on is displacing or drowning out the other: the site is still very young, and so site activity is still in the early days of growing, so new questions stay on the front page for a day or more. And that means that anyone passing by the front page, will find both local- and world- scale questions on a wide range of topics. That's our main shop window for now, until we build up a big body of awesome content on the search engines.

The launch process for this site is that we are trying to build up a body of content, and a group of regular contributors, as well as lots of interested passers-by.

The targets we need to hit to get this site out of beta, and to fully launched, are:

  • over 15 questions per day: currently 1.4
  • over 90% answered: currently 96%
  • over 150 users with 200 rep: currently 57
  • over 2.5 answers per question: currently 1.8
  • over 1500 visits per day: currently 113.

As you can see, we've got a lot of work to do; in particular, in building up the number of questions per day, and the number of visits per day. For now, that probably means keeping the audience, and the scope, sufficiently broad; while keeping the topic sufficiently well-defined enough to create a group of regular users with expertise in a topic that doesn't get too sprawling or unwieldy.

You can follow these stats on the relevant meta question.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .